<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Network Standards and Practices – Who applies the childproof cap?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindschmootz.net/2009/06/network-standards-and-practices-%e2%80%93-who-applies-the-childproof-cap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindschmootz.net/2009/06/network-standards-and-practices-%e2%80%93-who-applies-the-childproof-cap/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:23:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lets Hear It For “The Girls” &#8211; a commentary on Crystal Chappell’s SOW interview : mindschmootz</title>
		<link>http://mindschmootz.net/2009/06/network-standards-and-practices-%e2%80%93-who-applies-the-childproof-cap/comment-page-1/#comment-1026</link>
		<dc:creator>Lets Hear It For “The Girls” &#8211; a commentary on Crystal Chappell’s SOW interview : mindschmootz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindschmootz.net/?p=575#comment-1026</guid>
		<description>[...] nothing else from this article we can garner that the CBS censors are in full tilt.  I believe my previous suspicions are confirmed as even the body positions of this upcoming no-label-required tryst is interrupted by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nothing else from this article we can garner that the CBS censors are in full tilt.  I believe my previous suspicions are confirmed as even the body positions of this upcoming no-label-required tryst is interrupted by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The CBS Eye FOCUSed With Very Narrow Lens : mindschmootz</title>
		<link>http://mindschmootz.net/2009/06/network-standards-and-practices-%e2%80%93-who-applies-the-childproof-cap/comment-page-1/#comment-1007</link>
		<dc:creator>The CBS Eye FOCUSed With Very Narrow Lens : mindschmootz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindschmootz.net/?p=575#comment-1007</guid>
		<description>[...] Today, I learned that CBS has been collaborating with Focus On The Family for months massaging the message that will go out to millions of Americans.  According to FOTF spokesperson, Gary Schneeberger, “We&#8217;ve worked with [CBS] almost since the beginning.&#8221; He continues, &#8220;Our senior vice presidents talked to CBS executives throughout the process. It was a very cordial, very professional, fruitful relationship.&#8221;  Fruitful?  When citing network standards and practices when rejecting the gay dating website, www.mancrunch.com, did the central network labor with them to define and re-define their message and vet the dialogue?  Of course they didn’t, because that would be a “fruit” of a different color. I have been writing about CBS for months, and whether daytime or prime time, CBS network standards are a double standard. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today, I learned that CBS has been collaborating with Focus On The Family for months massaging the message that will go out to millions of Americans.  According to FOTF spokesperson, Gary Schneeberger, “We&#8217;ve worked with [CBS] almost since the beginning.&#8221; He continues, &#8220;Our senior vice presidents talked to CBS executives throughout the process. It was a very cordial, very professional, fruitful relationship.&#8221;  Fruitful?  When citing network standards and practices when rejecting the gay dating website, <a href="http://www.mancrunch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mancrunch.com</a>, did the central network labor with them to define and re-define their message and vet the dialogue?  Of course they didn’t, because that would be a “fruit” of a different color. I have been writing about CBS for months, and whether daytime or prime time, CBS network standards are a double standard. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://mindschmootz.net/2009/06/network-standards-and-practices-%e2%80%93-who-applies-the-childproof-cap/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindschmootz.net/?p=575#comment-474</guid>
		<description>And after the air kiss from Olivia today in the FOL - Oh CBS!!!!  

Get your head out of your pocketbook and look at how well it would serve the story and your pocketbooks in other ways if you were bold!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And after the air kiss from Olivia today in the FOL &#8211; Oh CBS!!!!  </p>
<p>Get your head out of your pocketbook and look at how well it would serve the story and your pocketbooks in other ways if you were bold!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://mindschmootz.net/2009/06/network-standards-and-practices-%e2%80%93-who-applies-the-childproof-cap/comment-page-1/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindschmootz.net/?p=575#comment-471</guid>
		<description>Looking at the recent half played out Y&amp;R moment this week with Rafe I think it&#039;s safe to say it&#039;s CBS with it&#039;s finger on the button.  And your final statement is so very true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the recent half played out Y&amp;R moment this week with Rafe I think it&#8217;s safe to say it&#8217;s CBS with it&#8217;s finger on the button.  And your final statement is so very true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ inTenn</title>
		<link>http://mindschmootz.net/2009/06/network-standards-and-practices-%e2%80%93-who-applies-the-childproof-cap/comment-page-1/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ inTenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindschmootz.net/?p=575#comment-456</guid>
		<description>I think that Otalia have suffered more than enough flagellation from almost every quarter for acts they have not committed and thus deserve many tender, mutual kisses, as well as passionate and fervent ones.  I have heard that Nuke &quot;makes out all the time,&quot; and can only reason that Crystal Chappell&#039;s uber sexuality and her chemistry with Jessica Leccia has the network scared to death that straight women all across America will suddenly go gay, thereby leaving millions of men to do their own laundry and resulting in the dramatic decrease of detergent sales.  I mean, Nuke doesn&#039;t do a thing for me, but Olivia Spencer would have me batting for the team if I weren&#039;t already.

It seems to me the networks are on this issue much like Obama is on DADT: trailing far behind not only the times but also public opinion and will have to be dragged kicking and screaming into the modern day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Otalia have suffered more than enough flagellation from almost every quarter for acts they have not committed and thus deserve many tender, mutual kisses, as well as passionate and fervent ones.  I have heard that Nuke &#8220;makes out all the time,&#8221; and can only reason that Crystal Chappell&#8217;s uber sexuality and her chemistry with Jessica Leccia has the network scared to death that straight women all across America will suddenly go gay, thereby leaving millions of men to do their own laundry and resulting in the dramatic decrease of detergent sales.  I mean, Nuke doesn&#8217;t do a thing for me, but Olivia Spencer would have me batting for the team if I weren&#8217;t already.</p>
<p>It seems to me the networks are on this issue much like Obama is on DADT: trailing far behind not only the times but also public opinion and will have to be dragged kicking and screaming into the modern day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://mindschmootz.net/2009/06/network-standards-and-practices-%e2%80%93-who-applies-the-childproof-cap/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindschmootz.net/?p=575#comment-455</guid>
		<description>Thank you for another very insightful article.

It&#039;s no wonder so many tv/film makers are moving to the web in order to gain creative control over their work.

It is a shame that the show has reached a point where it&#039;s so delicately guiding the audience that it is reducing the impact. Are the non-otaliaitis-afflicted viewers aware of what the issue is anymore? I really hope they scale things up a bit with the coming weeks. I want some kind of passion, even if it&#039;s only in the &#039;missing the one you love&#039; way. I am, however, continually delighted with the issues GL is covering and just hope that we get to see some kind of consummation in the future.

I&#039;m not too familiar but don&#039;t CBS control ATWT too? Is GL therefore under the same jurisdiction? Surely if they&#039;re happy with Nuke kisses there must be a reason for holding back? Perhaps it&#039;s a trade-off: 10 chaste kisses for 1 good old fashioned snog? Or 1 liplock in exchange for 4 coming out to children stories.

It seems strange to say: &#039;All I really want... is a kiss&#039; when there is so much else being given. But then, that&#039;s what we&#039;ve been trained to want, in every romantic movie and love story. That&#039;s the goal because it&#039;s such a beautiful gesture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for another very insightful article.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no wonder so many tv/film makers are moving to the web in order to gain creative control over their work.</p>
<p>It is a shame that the show has reached a point where it&#8217;s so delicately guiding the audience that it is reducing the impact. Are the non-otaliaitis-afflicted viewers aware of what the issue is anymore? I really hope they scale things up a bit with the coming weeks. I want some kind of passion, even if it&#8217;s only in the &#8216;missing the one you love&#8217; way. I am, however, continually delighted with the issues GL is covering and just hope that we get to see some kind of consummation in the future.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not too familiar but don&#8217;t CBS control ATWT too? Is GL therefore under the same jurisdiction? Surely if they&#8217;re happy with Nuke kisses there must be a reason for holding back? Perhaps it&#8217;s a trade-off: 10 chaste kisses for 1 good old fashioned snog? Or 1 liplock in exchange for 4 coming out to children stories.</p>
<p>It seems strange to say: &#8216;All I really want&#8230; is a kiss&#8217; when there is so much else being given. But then, that&#8217;s what we&#8217;ve been trained to want, in every romantic movie and love story. That&#8217;s the goal because it&#8217;s such a beautiful gesture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

